<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My husband wants to go out with &#8216;the boys&#8217;&#8230;.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.difficultrelationships.com/2008/12/02/my-husband-wants-to-go-out-with-the-boys/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.difficultrelationships.com/2008/12/02/my-husband-wants-to-go-out-with-the-boys/</link>
	<description>Difficult Relationships - honest answers to relationship dilemmas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 11:30:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rod E. Smith, MSMFT</title>
		<link>http://www.difficultrelationships.com/2008/12/02/my-husband-wants-to-go-out-with-the-boys/#comment-2896</link>
		<dc:creator>Rod E. Smith, MSMFT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 21:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rodesmith.wordpress.com/?p=1095#comment-2896</guid>
		<description>You are correct. Mr. Drattit, I am certainly not always consistent. Thanks for pointing it out to me.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are correct. Mr. Drattit, I am certainly not always consistent. Thanks for pointing it out to me&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ackroyd Drattit</title>
		<link>http://www.difficultrelationships.com/2008/12/02/my-husband-wants-to-go-out-with-the-boys/#comment-2895</link>
		<dc:creator>Ackroyd Drattit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 14:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rodesmith.wordpress.com/?p=1095#comment-2895</guid>
		<description>It seems, Mr. Smith, you have two standards where the flirtatiousness of one of the people in a monogamous relationship is concerned. Here you take the part of the wife and call the husband immature. When I complained (and a myriad of other people about theirs in comments that followed my posting) about my spouse&#039;s behavior, your opinion was my wife was just having &quot;fun&quot; and enjoying herself. Well, so is this husband was just &quot;having fun&quot; and &quot;enjoying himself,&quot; and aren&#039;t you going to imply this woman, his wife, is a wet blanket for raining on her husband&#039;s parade? 

Well, I&#039;ve said my piece. I agree with you and with her: her husband is a little boy and should have gone home where he belonged. He&#039;s a selfish pig for going out without his wife, and she&#039;s obviously got it together: she&#039;s booted him out and left him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems, Mr. Smith, you have two standards where the flirtatiousness of one of the people in a monogamous relationship is concerned. Here you take the part of the wife and call the husband immature. When I complained (and a myriad of other people about theirs in comments that followed my posting) about my spouse&#8217;s behavior, your opinion was my wife was just having &#8220;fun&#8221; and enjoying herself. Well, so is this husband was just &#8220;having fun&#8221; and &#8220;enjoying himself,&#8221; and aren&#8217;t you going to imply this woman, his wife, is a wet blanket for raining on her husband&#8217;s parade? </p>
<p>Well, I&#8217;ve said my piece. I agree with you and with her: her husband is a little boy and should have gone home where he belonged. He&#8217;s a selfish pig for going out without his wife, and she&#8217;s obviously got it together: she&#8217;s booted him out and left him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

