Subscription
Enter your e-mail address to receive this newspaper column each weekday.
My strict privacy policy will keep your email address 100% safe and secure.
QUESTION: My children (8 and 9) really like their mother’s boyfriend and I am fine with it. He is okay with the children and I know from a distant mutual acquaintance that he is a good father to his own children. The problem is that I think he tries too hard with mine and they say he is trying to take my place. I get all this third hand when the children come to me (most weekends). From your columns over the past few weeks I get the feeling it would be good for me to meet him. My ex-wife would probably not want me to meet him. What do you think?
RESPONSE: You have every right to meet any person who is sharing time with your children. You do not need your ex-wife’s permission. I’d suggest you phone him and cordially invite him to talk face-to-face. When you meet, don’t critique his relationship with your children, talk about your ex-wife or create any false alliance with him. Do not draw your ex-wife into this. He might choose to tell her about your phone call but that is something over which you have no control. Go well: you are being the man your children can respect.
Rod Smith's newspaper column has appeared weekdays in The Mercury for the past 10 years. This website, initiated to handle reader requests for past columns, has had over 1.3 million visits - with a daily average of 1000 visits. Rod sees clients every week day. He gives personal attention to every comment and letter. Nothing about this website or Rod's replies are automated. Readers purchasing assessments (see option on the right) will receive a solid hour of Rod's attention as he works through what the reader presents and formulates a helpful way forward.
Enter your e-mail address to receive this newspaper column each weekday.
My strict privacy policy will keep your email address 100% safe and secure.
When I was a boy I’d endlessly practice the fluent delivery of my name but it seldom flowed easily from my lips. As if it was new news to me, adults pointed out my stutter. Perhaps they thought I was beginning, at that precise moment, for the first time in my life to spit from the mouth, twist at the neck, jig my head back and forth trying to expel some inane statement log-jammed between my gut and my throat.
Idiots – always adults, children were surprisingly patient, – would make me repeat sentences as if a repeat performance of the humiliating uncoordinated gesticulations, my arms and legs flying in all directions, would make for an easier delivery the second time. That I’d just spent every ounce of energy trying to cough it up was lost on them. That I was already thoroughly humiliated was something to which they were blind.
“Practice, practice,” they’d say as if stutterers simply didn’t speak enough. “Think before you speak. Now – try that again,” they would declare slowly and loudly as if I was stupid and deaf. These thoughtless people were ignorant of just how much stutterers do think. Too much – which is central to the issue!
If I’d known at twelve or thirteen that the day would come when I’d make a career of public speaking I might have strolled off a high-rise building.
Now it is quite easy to hide. I am very comfortable with crowds.
It’s asking driving directions or ordering food at a drive through where it gets tricky. Sitting in a cozy circle waiting for my turn to introduce myself sends my blood-pressure through the roof. The ticket attendant on the London underground can render me dumb after I’ve just spent days addressing a room full of graduate level adults about Family Systems Theory. I know. It sounds ridiculous.
I was almost immobilized the first time I saw Thulani put himself “on duty” in the event he needed to be my mouthpiece. He did it. No one asked him or appointed him. He just did it.
If the inside of a house (outside, too, I suppose) is a metaphor of the lives of the people who live in it – which is something I once read somewhere – gosh, are we in trouble. Our house is a mess.
I consistently clean it room by room, thinking often of the legend that the Golden Gate Bridge that says there’s some guy constantly painting it. I feel for him. While I am sure the view is wonderful I must believe that the poor guy whose doing it daily from one end to the other must find the wind and the weather quite a challenge.
Our house is the same, but instead of painting from end to end and back again, I am the guy constantly cleaning, – and, it’s hard to tell.
Where I cleaned and swept and dusted and vacuumed and sponged and sterilized yesterday there are scooters and bicycles (boys), mail in piles (me), books (boys and me), newspapers (me), magazines (me), and socks (boys and Max, the Chihuahua).
Turn my back and the boys and Max are at it again – enjoying life as boys (and a dog) while I find being a cleaning lady quite an exhausting challenge.
There is a point of no return, I’ve noticed, or at least a point of the chaos where I feel compelled to let it all go for a while and I throw up my hands and join in the fun of trashing the place.
But when I clean I like to think I’m just like the guy painting the Bridge, which I can only imagine must be a slow and methodical task.
I do it room by room, starting at one end, the front, in the event that I soon lose interest – then, at least, the front room is somewhat in order. I push it (trash, magazines, books, socks, clothes) all back from the living room, through the piano room, then into the TV room until everything lands up in the kitchen.
Once it hits the kitchen I separate out what’s Max’s – he’s has his own set of toys with which he ruins the house – what’s Nate’s, what’s Thulani’s, and what can be recycled, dumped, restacked on bookshelves, placed in drawers, hung on a hanger, or filed in the “important documents” file I keep losing.
We moved into “122” (creatively named for its street number and which has had very few updates since it was built in 1886) when Thulani was about two – and I have been getting it in order ever since. Nate joined us in 2002. Max, in 2009. The house- attachment, at least for the boys and Max, is strong. When I talk of selling Thulani reminds me that Rhino, the husky that was on the run for nine months and returned to die within a few weeks after we reconnected, is buried in an Air France first class cabin blanket just outside of the kitchen door. Nate reminds me of where the fat goldfish is buried and Thulani ends the litany with his inability to think of living in a house without the large tree in the front yard where he has his brother (and Max) have “peed like boys” (and a dog) for the past several years.
So. I’ll go on painting and, before you send me letters about giving the boys chores and responsibilities and assigning daily tasks and getting on top of it before it gets on top of me let me advise that you are barking up the wrong tree (sorry, Max for the dog metaphor) because we do have all that in place and it does work here and there and off and on.
I know, I know. Consistency is the name of the game for parenting and let me tell you, the ONLY thing that is consistent here is the need to keep going room by room with or without the boys (and Max) to get this little bridge painted one stretch at a time so the world can see just how organized and decent our lives are here at our beloved “122.”
Being a white South African reared under Apartheid is no simple matter. It permeated everything for me. While I do not pretend to have been a political activist, I was always cognizant that my privileges, simply a result of being born white, were unmerited, and most unfair especially when enjoyed at the expense of others who were not. I think this unsettling truth (for I took advantage of my station in life) was somewhat of a companion to me from the age of about six or seven.
I am regularly aware that:- I was discouraged from playing soccer in the “front” yard (in view of the neighbors) with the servant’s children. While this may seem insignificant in the light of other much more severe problems rising from racism, it was huge for me as a child on several fronts. I loved the children and I loved soccer even more. They were excellent soccer players.
- I did attend a segregated school as did almost all white South Africans while there did exist some church schools that were integrated even under Apartheid. I vividly recall my school principal scolding the entire student body (over a thousand white boys) because a domestic worker (a black adult man) was seen walking in the neighborhood wearing a school blazer.
- Although, by no means wealthy, I was waited on hand and foot by a full-time servant.
- In the late 80s I was warned not to pray publicly for Prisoner “Nelson” Mandela from my church pulpit.
- A member of my family did balk at my request that I bring black children to his home-swimming pool to swim.
- Even as late as 1987 I was embarrassed that a young black boy whom I’d “helped” in his squatter camp had shown up at my door unannounced. I recall wondering what the neighbors would think seeing a child arriving at the home for a social visit and not to work in the yard.
While I am aware that these are piddly problems in the light of what millions faced under the Apartheid regime, I am also aware that these factors in my immediate environment “shaped” me into believing perverse things (like in my own superiority and in “their” inferiority) about persons of other race groups. More significantly, I am frequently reminded that my children and I could not have shared life as we now do if we were still living in the era of Apartheid.
We live very close to our school and church, so close we can hear the school bell from our kitchen and the church bells in my bedroom.
Sometimes we walk to both and we don’t see the car for days.
I like it. I like not having to get in and out of the car. I like not having to negotiate traffic, something as synonymous with life in the USA as Disney, Fast Food, and the Fourth of July.
That’s the upside.
We are a 10-hour-drive to the nearest coast – and, most of the east coast beaches are not worth the drive. The west coast, which has many wonderful beaches comparable to where I was reared, takes three full days of driving to reach.
Being landlocked is one thing but another is the weather. Indiana weather is erratic, neurotic, and downright psychotic.
Days ago I could’ve (but I didn’t) ice-skated across the street. Now, as I write, there’s a small lake in the street next to the sidewalk from last night’s rain. The weather is so brutal and extreme (it is as hot as blazes in the summers) that when we do drive anywhere (there are no grocery stores in walking distance) the streets are often full of potholes making some of America’s finest suburban streets resemble stretches of road you’d find in a rural stretch of South Africa’s Wild Coast. So, I am exaggerating but really not too much. Washington Boulevard is a challenge to drive right now, you have got to dodge potholes and loose pavement or, unless you drive a tank, you stand to severely damage your suspension.
But I do love living here. My neighbors are some of my best friends. My children are free and safe in the neighborhood and everyone knows everyone’s children. Even as I write Joseph (born a week or so before Thulani) from down the street has wondered into the house and it is quite likely he will eat with us, stay the night, and then wander down back down the street to his home sometime in the morning. His mom and I will talk sometime between now and nightfall unless he of course chooses to wonder off home and be gone just as quickly as he showed up.
Potholes and crazy weather won’t send us running, although we will drive to church in the morning – even though it is really close. I’m not sure I want to brave the elements which could be a snow-storm, an ice storm, the threat of a tornado – or a little or a lot of each. What else could you expect during March in Indiana?
If you wait until you are ready to adopt a child you never will because you will never be ready. The baby, and only the baby, will make you ready. Reading the right books will be helpful, but “ready” magically comes upon you when a real baby is sleeping in your arms or crying in the middle of the night. If you are not ready to change diapers – and I always am amused at the big deal about this non-issue – being unprepared will last only as long as a clean diaper. Of course you can go baby-stuff-shopping, get a room painted, stencil yellow ducks on the wall – if you know long enough in advance your child is coming. But painting a bedroom with ducks and rainbows and a pot of gold, and getting a truck load of stuff from your local one-stop baby emporium will only fill your home with a lot of weird and wonderful, and mostly unnecessary, equipment.
Children interrupt everything. It is the child who is really ready to teach you, whether you are or not. Once he arrives he will become the hub of all your scheduling. You will be fine with this because the child is not an interruption to your life but rather, from this point on, central to it.
The baby will make you ready and you can’t really prepare for the baby until he is breathing in the crib right next to your bed.
Copyright 2011 Rod E Smith - Difficult Relationships. All rights reserved.
15 Comments
Monica
Hi, Rod. What’s the title of your book?
30 Mar 2006 07:03 am
Chris
Hi! My name is Chris and I work at Help.com. One of our members posted a question and after reading your blog I thought you might be able to provide some expert advise to the question I forwarded. Crystalan describes herself as only 21 but with two kids. She writes:
“HE is driving me crazy!! He goes threw my mail, goes threw the scroll down on the computer to see the sites I have went to. there was a storie on cosmo about this guy who was cheeting on his wife I read it he found out and got mad!! I run a daycare and LITERALLY every dad, grandpa, uncle, and yes, even moms he accuses me of doing stuff, I not only have 2 kids of my own but the daycare kids too, what do he think I am just going to do something in front of them? I have never cheated but at this point I feel as though I am being treated worse than if I did. our daughter is 3 and he is like a step dad and has been there all her life I am afraid if I leave him she will never get to see him and if she does he will tell her dad to start problems and our son is 2 and I know he will drag me threw courtrooms and they have $ i dont nor do I have much support. PLEASE SOMEONE WRITE ANYTHING YOU THINK WILL HELP, he even has his mom and dad who live a block away look down at our house to be sure nobody is here”
06 Apr 2006 03:04 pm
jealousy problems/ only 21 /but 2 kids » cmtheisen
[...] http://rodesmith.wordpress.com/2006/03/28/ex-wife-new-man-children/ [...]
Rod E. Smith, MSMFT
Thanks Chris at Help.com — I welcome the many readers you have sent my way. If your readers browse my blog they are certain to find a similar issue — after 6 years of getting letters from people all over the world one begins to see patterns in the way things go both right and wrong!
02 May 2006 09:05 pm
kobe bean
You have every right to meet any person who is sharing time with your children. Are you freaking kidding me? What RIGHT are you referring to? My stepkids dad is a complete jerk/woman abuser. He lied to the court to try and make my wife (his ex) to stay in the state of NM to watch his children. She offered to let him have custody, but he didn’t want that responsibility, just the control over where his ex wife lived. He lost. He’s a piece of garbage and he has NO RIGHT to meet me whatsoever. Only an idiot would call that a right – you must be an idiot.
17 Oct 2006 09:10 pm
Rod E. Smith, MSMFT
…. thanks Kobe Bean, for your response (or, I should say, reaction). I hope your relationship with you wife and the children will be very fulfilling for you all.
Thanks for reading my column.
Rod
18 Oct 2006 03:10 am
Itsjustme
Rod,
I agree with Kobe…exactly what RIGHT does an ex-spouse have to meet (or know personal information about) their ex-spouse’s new boy/girlfriend? I see in your response to Kobe that you didn’t exacty answer that.
12 Dec 2006 12:12 am
Rod E. Smith, MSMFT
….. when people co-parent the SAME children, it is usually a good thing that they esablish some form of relationship. Of course there are situations where this is not wise (as is apparently the case with Kobe). A dad has a right to know the people who are involved with his children as a co-parent no matter what Kobe might believe about the man to whom his wife was formerly married.
12 Dec 2006 09:12 am
Dazed&Confused
Dear All:
Any advice you can give would be most appreciated… My boyfriend and I have been dating for approximately 8 mos. and we are very much in love. He speaks of marriage as does his family and I can only assume/hope that we wil head that way in the near future.
Situation: When we met he was still legally married, although he had been seperated from his ex for approx. a year and living in seperate locations, despite some hesitation I went forward with my relationship trusting divorce was what he wants and that he would be sure to get it done as he knew my thoughts on the matter. The divorce is now almost final which is good news, but the issue the ex. She is really not an issue, but it has been one for me.
You see they have a 3 year old daughter, and in the past months the daughter and I have grown very close. I love her, she is sooo sweet and loving. We get along great, and per my boyfriend she always asks for me even when I am not around.
Given all of this I have felt lately that it would be appropriate for me to meet the ex. For the sole purpose that I am around her daughter so much and since I have and assume I will continue to be apart of her daughter’s life I feel it only appropriate that we have the ability to have a cordial relationship.
So, once when I mentioned it to my boyfriend he was hesitant about this, so I let it go, but now I feel because we are so serious and the timeframe it is time.
Am I wrong here? Is there no reason for me to meet the ex? Won’t she always be apart of our lives and is it wrong for me to at least want to form a cordial relationship?
My boyfriend says “she is not the nicest person” and “I don’t want to subject you to meeting her”? Sooooo “you’ll meet her when the time is right!”
Is this weird or am I out of line here and I should not wish to meet her or establish any type of realtionship? NOTE: She has NOT requested to meet me…
I would appreciate any feedback since this is all new and very foreign to me.
06 Jan 2007 04:01 am
Rod E. Smith, MSMFT
Dear Dazed and Confused:
I hope you check back and see this:
It is appropriate, and essential, that you meet the child’s mother since you (I assume) will co-parent the child. But methinks you are assuming too much (regarding his desire to marry you). Your future is far too valuable to be left to hopes and assumptions.
Yours
Rod Smith
06 Jan 2007 10:01 pm
Dazed&Confused
Thanks Rod, noted
I appreciate the feedback and “wake up call”.
I have decided, based on feedback from others and my boyfriend’s decision that now is NOT the time to meet her. SHOULD our relationship transpire to the next level we will deal with an introduction then.
For now, just one day at a time and I will see where we end up.
Thanks again!
Best,
D&C
10 Jan 2007 03:01 am
Mister-M
Ah, yes… the difficult relationship. In my case, toss in a probably personality disorder – and it all gets a whole lot worse.
30 Dec 2007 08:12 pm
Rebecca cook
Where is it in ca law that says a parent has a right to know who their ex is shacked up with as well as room mates. My son’s ex will not allow him to meet he new boyfriend.
06 Mar 2008 02:03 pm
Thomas Bower
I liked the input of this article/blog, but my question is: What am I supposed to do if I ever have to meet the person my wife cheated on me with? How should I treat him and let him know I disappove of his “taking my wife from me” and that he is NOT and NEVER WILL BE my two kids’ father, but that I am “not out for blood” in vengence against him. – Tom of York, PA
04 Oct 2009 08:10 am
Rod E. Smith, MSMFT
Thomas -- thanks for your question. I will get to it in a day or two. It will be a post, not a reply in where your comment appears. Nothing here is automated. This is Rod Smith and I am a real person (as real as I can be).
Thanks for reading and writing,
Rod
04 Oct 2009 11:10 am
Leave a Comment